Transparency International - Donor anti-corruption policies

Most donors have adopted specific anti-corruption policies to guide their development co-operation work. Poverty reduction strategies increasingly take corruption into account. The World Bank began to address corruption in the mid-1990s. Other donors followed suit. Still there are critical voices arguing that donor support for anti-corruption strategies and reforms do not actually meet the needs. The Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has initiated work on lessons learnt by donors in the practice of fighting corruption. Enhanced effectiveness in fighting corruption is a priority. OECD-DAC and TI jointly organised the DAC Partnership Forum on “Improving donor effectiveness in combating corruption 9-10 December 2004”. One major conclusion from the Forum was that there is a broad consensus on the need for increased dialogue and cooperation among donors and aid recipients to improve donor effectiveness in combating corruption. Throughout the Forum it was noted that corruption affects every sector, every bureaucracy, in every country. Increased horizontal cooperation among donors, with other sectors of government and the private sector was seen as essential for fighting corruption. In strengthening the demand for accountability, parliaments and civil society were identified as having pivotal roles to play.

View full text ››    Print     Email     Comment     Add content

Contributor: Anuradha Bhattacharjee
Published Date: February 29, 2008

Member Comments: (1)

Bryane Michael ( Member ) email Full Name
This forum has started to provide a much needed critical voice about donors' anti-corruption policies. Since the 2004 OECD meeting (which I was fortunate enough to attend), we have seen very little improvement in donors' policies. Indeed, for some of the most opaque anti-corruption funders (such as USAID and CIDA), public information is still unavailable. The UN's International Group for Anti-Corruption Co-ordination remains the most egregious offender (after several requests for information, I went to UN and World Bank Ombudsman offices who didn't even reply to my request for assistance!). So much for transparency.... For a review and rating of the donor's anti-corruption policies, see http://works.bepress.com/bryane_michael/10/
[March  31, 2008]
 
What is in this site? Member Services About this Community About dgCommunities User Help Contact Us